I feel a little responsible

IP:

posted November 05, 2004 07:43 PM         

---

i CAN'T UNDERSTAND why???lol p)

IP:

IP:

IP:

[This message has been edited by Irascible (edited November 07, 2004).]

IP:

Yeah, you may want to move the thread. We're making the atheists and humanists uncomfortable.

IP:

------------------
Tread Marks Ladders

IP:

posted November 08, 2004 03:04 PM            

---

iras: (btw, did you know that iras translates to spanish as anger, lol.
(I'm also glad I didn't send the original response to you ) (I think I'll e-mail it to you though ) perhaps you either the only to appreciate it/follow it
Anyways, quick remarks though: (quoting you)
Pab: Your sermonizing is liberal dogma, not Christian doctrine.
Christian doctrine?? I didn't know there was one absolute! you mean the catholic one? or..protestant... or lutheran... or..??
Christ was not a hippie who sat around telling everyone to make love not war.
Really? lol. like daa!
He in fact said that he came to bring the sword, not peace.
Uhm yeah, but you don't know if you're one of the plants to be trimmed..
...take a look at the Old Testament. God ordered Israel to commit the wholesale slaughter of evil cultures. Did God hate those individuals? Of course not.
Actually he did, and he does hate, that's why he sent the angel of death more than once around evil doers. But, G-d ordered wars to prophets not mere people... pfft.
My hate of the militant wing of Islam is fully justified and VERY Christian in exactly the same way.
Of course I don't like the extremist muslims , but you've referred to them (Islamic culture) as a whole evil culture so far... hence my observations....

[This message has been edited by pablito (edited November 08, 2004).]

IP:

Sigh again. He hated. But he did not hate those individuals. He hated their actions and their malevolent culture. But he loved those individuals as much as you and me. It seems you have a 666 like problem of reading but not understanding. :P

IP:

posted November 11, 2004 11:28 AM            

---

Finally; you're using your heart more than your head.
As for the 666 comment. I'll let that one slide...

[This message has been edited by pablito (edited November 14, 2004).]

IP:

Now THAT'S the biggest insult of all! :P

IP:

posted November 15, 2004 10:37 AM            

---

ahh give it up... there's nothing soft about being soft... females love it lol. (Don't care what the males think/do).

IP:

Healthy masculinity certainly must have its soft component. It just shouldn't be defined by it. You can have your Clinton-esque "I feel your pain" manhood. I'll take the stoic John Wayne types over that any day of the week. John Wayne types get things done while Clinton types are having feelings about things that they might get done. :P

IP:

posted November 15, 2004 01:10 PM            

---

yeah, but the only kisses John Wayne got were from acting; lol. (William C. wasn't an actor, nor he got kissed in the mouth, lol).
sigh, do I need to specify every single point of view from any remark...?
(Men that let their women run the relationship are biatches,,, lol).. I'm talking soft as Jim Morrison soft, not Jim Carrey soft,.... then again, if you're dating Melissa Joan Hart (damn, did a search and realized she got married ...
...anyways, if she was single, and I could date her... maybe I'll be a biatch too.............................................................then again ....... maybe until the honey moon it's over...............then again .......

IP:

You mean THAT Jim Morrison?

IP:

posted November 16, 2004 10:50 AM            

---

lol, you crack me up:
you forgot the philospher, actor, poet, composer, and great singer (he was an alcoholic more then anything, womanizer yes, even Marc Anthony was LOL. (even)... his wife didn't wack herself! she overdosed with heroin...(not on purpose as most of them Jim pushed masses to chaos because he wanted to reveal against squares like you :P but he was a nerd too lol. A rock star with more knowledge than a teacher in these days... yeah, that Jim Morrison

IP:

There's talented people who spread good things but happen to be human and therefore flawed in some fashion or another. And then there are those who revel in their depravity and spread evil at every turn. Jimmy was the latter. One's talents can't justify so much purely sick behavior. The message and the messenger are inexorably linked. If Christ taught as he did but lived an evil life, his message would have been dismissed and he would have had no impact on history. Jimmy may have had some talents, but his life was so vile and corrupt that his talents are imminently dismissible. Yeah, I know they weren't and that's fine. There are always plenty of mindless stooges with money that would buy from Satan himself if he put out a hit record. But I am not one of them. If you wish to extol the virtues of that piece of dirt, knock yourself out.

IP:

IP:

IP:

Overdosing on drugs IS wacking yourself. :P

IP:

IP:

IP:

posted November 17, 2004 05:00 AM            

---

...but who actually grew watching them? :P (as if you don't get the hint, here's another one):
I'm 8 hours away to get in a plane that will take me from one part of the world (OH-US) to another (Quito-Ecuador).. few hours and I will be enjoying the "re-encounter" of soul back to the mother land!!! ah yippie & a skippie!!! (for 3 weeks)
I may try to do the clan battle; I installed TM on my laptop and got 62 fps.. not too shavie!!
All I'm worrying it's dial-up connection from hundreds of hops away
so, cya. In the words of our people (Conceptualized by your mind).
Go in peace, pale face that angers quick :P

IP:

posted November 28, 2004 01:59 AM            

---

LOL - you guys SUCK at seeing each others point of view.... no wonder we're at war ! "Open your minds".... and preferably NOT with an AK47

IP:

IP: